Set up the assessment once, then move through the workflow with a clear reading order.
Choose the path, confirm the role, and make the comparison context explicit. The report and development plan will follow the setup you lock here.
Published leadership rolesCurrent-role vs target-role comparisonMarket context wordingPersisted development plan
Step 1
Assessment goal
Start with the question you want answered first, then choose the depth of the session.
Assessment method
Classic is balanced and faster. Bold is more challenging. Classic uses the Bearing leadership method. Bold uses the Challenger/FLI method with stronger trade-off pressure.
Selected setup: Target role assessment • Bold methodComparison mode: Target role vs market with current-role reference
Step 2
Current role context (for comparison)
This is pulled from the confirmation step and can still be adjusted here before the session starts.
Current role: Not setLevel: Not set
Step 3
Find a matching role
Search the published catalog first. Title, industry, and level only narrow the list. Starting requires you to confirm one published role from the catalog.
0 role option(s) loadedNo published role confirmed yet
Search confidence helps you rank catalog hits. It does not start the assessment or score you.
Guardrail: the app does not auto-start from title text or CV guesses. You must confirm one published role.
No published roles found with current filters. Try clearing industry or level, or use a broader title.
Start leadership assessment
Both options keep deterministic scoring. Standard and deep dive differ in evidence depth, scenario pressure, and total prompt volume.